Comparison Chart

From Pyra Wiki
Revision as of 09:28, 19 March 2016 by welshphreak (talk | contribs) (Add Neoi900)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pyra GPD Win Neo900 Pandora 1Ghz
Size ~141 x 87 x 33mm[1] 155 x 96 x 20mm[2] 111 x 60 x 20mm 140 x 83 x 27mm[3]
Screen size 5"[4] 5.5"[2] 3.5"[5] 4.3"[3]
Screen resolution 1280x720 (720p)[4] 1280x720 (720p)[2] 800x480[5] 800x480[3]
Touchscreen Resistive (Stylus included) Capacitive, multitouch[2] Dualtouch Resistive (Stylus included)[5] Resistive (Stylus included)[1]
Keyboard Layout[6] Good[7] Problematic [6] OK OK
Keyboard Backlight Yes[4] No Yes No
Keyboard keys 45[8] 67[9] 38 43[10]
Face buttons 6[4] 4[2] 0 4[3]
Shoulder buttons 4[4] 4[2] 0 2[3]
Control buttons 8[8] 10[9] 4 3[10]
Analogue control Nubs, clickable[4] mini-joysticks[2] None Nubs[3]
Simultaneous use of mouse and all other controls Yes No[2] n/a Yes
Volume control Wheel[4] Buttons[2] Buttons Wheel[3]
Primary Operating System Debian GNU/Linux ARMhf (modified) Microsoft Windows 10[2] Debian GNU/Linux ARMhf (modified)[5] SuperZaxxon[11]
Free/libre OS (per DFSG) default non-free 3D graphics drivers No non-free 3D graphics drivers[12] non-free 3D graphics drivers, WiFi, Bluetooth
Free/libre OS (per DFSG) when running Linux non-free 3D graphics drivers Possibly (at least free 3D graphics drivers)[13] non-free 3D graphics drivers[12] non-free 3D graphics drivers, WiFi, Bluetooth
Microsoft Windows x86 compatibility via WINE plus an x86 emulator (such as Exagear) Native x86 via WINE plus an x86 emulator (such as Exagear) via WINE plus an x86 emulator (such as Exagear)
CPU TI OMAP5432: 2x ARM Cortex-A15 1.5Ghz NEON SIMD[4] Intel Atom x5-Z8550: 4x Intel Cherry Trail x86_64 1.44Ghz SSE SIMD[14] TI DM3730: 1x Cortex-A8 1 GHz NEON SIMD[5] TI OMAP3730: 1x ARM Cortex A8 @ 1.0 Ghz with NEON SIMD[3]
RAM 2GiB DDR3L-533 Dual-Channel[4][15] 4GiB LPDDR3-1600[2] 1GiB[5] 512MiB DDR1 @ 200Mhz[3]
GPU PowerVR SGX544-MP2[4] Intel HD Graphics 400 @ 200-600MHz, 12-core, shared memory[14] PowerVR SGX PowerVR SGX530 @ 200MHz[3]
Co-processor(s) Ti C64+ DSP; 2x ARM Cortex m4 @ 200Mhz(IPU)[4]

Vivante GC320 2D Accelerator[4]

None Ti C64x+ DSP Ti C64x DSP @ 800MHz[3]
Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n[4] IEEE 802.11 b/g/n[2] IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n[5] IEEE 802.11 b/g[3]
Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.0[4] Bluetooth 4.0[2] Bluetooth 4.0[5] Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR[3]
Cell modem (SIM card slot) Optional: Built-in LTE Modem: 100Mbps download, 50Mbps upload[4] No Built-in LTE Modem: 100Mbps download, 50Mbps upload; OR: UMTS HSPA 14.4/5.76 Mbps with CDMA[5] No
Satellite navigation (GNSS) If with cell modem: GPS, cell tower assisted A-GPS, GLONASS[4] No GPS/GLONASS[5] No
Upgrades Display, CPU-Board No Via USB in battery compartment No
Battery 6000mAh[4], 4.2V? 6000mAh. ?V[2] 1320mAh? 4200mAh[3], 4.2V
Battery life (claimed, high power draw) 10 hours[16] 8 hours[2] 10 hours[3]
Removable battery? Yes No Yes, hotswap Yes
Video output Micro-HDMI (type D)[4] Mini-HDMI (type C)[2] Yes custom connector required, S-Video + RCA + Line-In &- Out[3]
USB 1x Type A 3.0[17], 1x Type A 2.0, 1x Micro-3.0, 1x Micro-B (debug/charging)[4] 1x Type A 3.0, 1x Micro-B 2.0 (host)[2] Micro-AB 2.0 (OTG)[5] 1x Type A 2.0 (host, lacks 1.1 -- needs hub), 1x Micro-AB OTG[3]
Memory card slots[18] 2x SDXC <=512GiB/Slot = 1TiB, 1x internal microSDXC <=200GiB = 1.2TiB[4] 1x microSD <=200GiB[2] 1x microSD 2x SDXC <=512GiB/Slot = 1TiB[3]
Embedded storage ?Gb[19] eMMC 64GiB eMMC[2] 64GiB eMMC[5] 512MiB NAND[3]
FM radio Rx & Tx[5]
Camera No No VGA front & 5 MP rear[5] No
NFC No No Yes[5] No
Main countries of manufacture Germany, Greece China Germany, UK, China

[4] [2] [14] [5] [12] [3] [6]

  1. ↑ No official statement, looks thicker than the Pandora from the Pics
  2. ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/a-laptop-fitting-in-your-pocket--2#/
  3. ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 http://pandorawiki.org/Pandora
  4. ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 https://pyra-handheld.com/boards/pages/pyratech/
  5. ↑ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 http://neo900.org/specs
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 The GPD Win seems to be too large to reach the Center Keys see here: [2] Also the Keyboard is not Centered, and the Layout isn't optimal[3]
  7. ↑ Video of the Prototype(at around 5:40)
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Pyra mockup image
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 GPD Win mockup image
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 OpenPandora photo
  11. ↑ derived from Ångström, a GNU/Linux variant for ARM[4]
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 http://neo900.org/faq
  13. ↑ This depends on hardware details, particularly for the BIOS (currently non-free) and perhaps the WiFi and Bluetooth (non-free on the Pandora)
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/a-laptop-fitting-in-your-pocket--2#/comments
  15. ↑ Datasheet
  16. ↑ No official statement
  17. ↑ Its an USB 3.0 Port, providing normal USB 2.0 while using the additional Connectors for eSATA (6GBit/s) instead of USB 3.0 (5GBit/s)
  18. ↑ Using already available SD(XC)-Card sizes as the SDXC-Standard has an theoretical maximum of 2TiB/Card and those Cards simply don't exist yet.
  19. ↑ Size not yet decided.
Retrieved from "http://pyra-handheld.com/wiki/index.php?title=Comparison_Chart&oldid=247"