sam fisher
Well-Known Member
seems like the GP32 runs better at 133 than a GP2x at 200mhz lol!
Hu6280 Alpha V0.5 Released
- Thread starter vobboomg
- Start date
iignotus
The one and only
lol it seems like that's been said a dozen times in this thread already lol!sam fisher posted on May 20 2006 at 10:52 AM said:
Last edited by a moderator:
sam fisher
Well-Known Member
All by me loliignotus posted on May 20 2006 at 04:13 PM said:
Last edited by a moderator:
rokdcasbah
got me a date with botticelli's niece
great work vobbo. also i love the 3d tunnel demo. also the weed flavored version...
Epicenter
Well-Known Member
iignotus posted on May 20 2006 at 10:13 AM said:
It's absolutely wrong, though. There are plenty of factors to consider in how the programs you're comparing are written, and this is far from a fair comparison since these are 2 entirely different versions of one emulator. If you took a platform-independent version and compiled it for the GP32 and 2x with as many factors the same as possible (e.g. compilers) you could do a more fair comparison.
At any rate, it's just simple logic code runs faster on a 200 MHz ARM9 than a 133 MHz one, unless some sort of other bottleneck is introduced, which at this point, there does NOT appear to be. And I'll bet if you ran 2xMark on the GP32 you'd see quite the linear performance curve from 133->200 MHz.
Last edited by a moderator: