Letalis Sonus: resistive screens may recognise up to 16 pressure levels but electromagnetic digitisers can recognise up to 1024 pressure levels (e.g. the Galaxy Note 3) or even 2048 pressure levels (the Intuos 4 graphics tablets). That's a big difference.
On your second point: I don't know...
Why not an electromagnetic digitiser instead of a resistive touchscreen? Such digitisers (e.g. Wacom) offer much higher precision, the ability to track an object that is not touching the screen and can gather much more information about the stylus (such as pressure levels) when compared to...
Resistive touchscreens in 2014 is an anachronism. They are a dated technology that has been superceded by capacitive ones. Modern interfaces in most OS support capacitive screens e.g. Windows 8 (albeit a terrible implementation), Ubuntu's Unity, KDE's Plasma Active, the Linux operating system on...
According to pyra-handheld.com/specs.html it is slated to have a resistive touchscreen. I think that this would be a grave mistake. They are unresponsive and prone to scratching which means that they require an annoying screen protector with it's inherant bubbles or trapped dust. Whatsmore...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.