I think most people would run into motion sickness flying around like you did in Portal 1. Releasing all existing Valve games to support VR would be nice. There are unofficial VR mods for Half-Life 1 and 2 already, so people have the option to play it like that. I probably feel sick when playing like that, but still good to have.I'd be interested in Portal 3 VR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FazeobVWdmM
Not interested
I'm wondering anyways, why we in Europe don't have something like TSMC. Isn't their tooling made in the Netherlands by what was started a daughter company by Philips? And isn't that the only one of its kind? Maybe I'm confusing things.Rumors in tech news: Apple is looking into moving parts of their production to Intel (US) for their M-series chips. Currently these are made by TSMC in Taiwan.
While Apple appears to be able to switch hardware platforms, like going from PowerPC to Intels X86, and later to ARM. They now appear to actively move more production back to the US. So, in the future iPhones and iPads might really be made in the US. That will take more effort thought as other parts and their assembly also still happen abroad.
ED might have been a pioneer in trying to do these things in Europe with the Open-Pandora and Pyra. And I guess that will keep being a challenge as I don't get these strong signals from European companies yet.
With the US being more protective and appears to value group cohesion less, do you think it's a good development? Should the EU do the same and support the US iniatives second compared to EU ones?
Or should we focus on getting the US big first compared to, for example, relying on China for our production.
Yes, and the root of the production process is developed in Belgium at Imec. Ireland has an Intel high-end fab. Global Foundries is still in Germany.I'm wondering anyways, why we in Europe don't have something like TSMC. Isn't their tooling made in the Netherlands by what was started a daughter company by Philips? And isn't that the only one of its kind? Maybe I'm confusing things.
Fair. But are "good" and "bad" defined well? And the patent system is fundamentally flawed, too. It protects the inventor, who may have invested a lot into development, from others taking advantage of their efforts. But the inventor isn't necessarily the best at applying its invention or the best market actor in its field.A competitive commercial landscape where good companies get more funding and bad companies go broke quickly seems the best way.
Yes - the chips that sell the most, because they offer good performance / price ratio. The market decides, and I mean the chip market not the stock market.But are "good" and "bad" defined well?
