RiX0R posted on Apr 18 2006 at 09:11 AM said:
Sorry daclassicgamingmaster, I can no longer take you seriously.
There was a time you did take him seriously ?
This is very disturbing. I thought America's current imaginary bogey man was the WMD potential in Iran. Or have they decided even they can not get away with that farce twice in a row after Iran. Is China the new 'red under the bed' ? The american people should be more concerned with checking out the supposed rigging of their electoral system (if that is not a crime under the patriot act). They would also do well to support the calls to reopen the 911 investigations.
These baby-eating stories serve a purpose - to divert everyone's attention away from home with sensationalist crap and create an enemy the government can 'protect' us from. We are more willing to pay our taxes if we believe they are being spent to protect us. Very few people will take these pictures seriously but it lays down an idea in the back of people's minds. Slowly new attrocities will be revealed building on this idea and before long there is fear built up in the minds of the populace based on nothing but rumor. Perhaps they should take away some more freedoms to protect the citizens from baby eaters.
If a government is unprepared it needs a 'pearl harbor' or '9/11' to justify its actions. The real trick is to have the consant threat of a 'cold war'. Having lost the soviet threat they need a new menace to control us with. China is still communist so they fit the bill nicely.
Why such a big deal about eating dogs ? The west eats pork which is taboo in many cultures. Do you want them to condemn you for what your culture finds acceptable to eat ?