Do you guys find that formatting to a particular cluster size gives more reliability or performance? Do you guys prefer FAT or FAT32?
I have two 4GB cards from different manufacturers. One was preformatted FAT32 with 4K clusters (el cheapo), the other one (Transcend) was preformatted to FAT32 with 32K clusters.
Why would Transcend preformat to such a large cluster size (Windows default for FAT32 4GB is 4K) since it causes a wastage of space? Is it a reliability or performance issue?
I have two 4GB cards from different manufacturers. One was preformatted FAT32 with 4K clusters (el cheapo), the other one (Transcend) was preformatted to FAT32 with 32K clusters.
Why would Transcend preformat to such a large cluster size (Windows default for FAT32 4GB is 4K) since it causes a wastage of space? Is it a reliability or performance issue?