Silent-Hunter
Hardcore Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2010
- Messages
- 3,485
Well even if the blobs are nonfree, their inputs and outputs can be checked for stuff like that.
Well even if the blobs are nonfree, their inputs and outputs can be checked for stuff like that.
Check out the development history of the nouveau driver, they literally reverse engineered the proprietary driver by observing it as a black box, including writing their own free firmware.How would you check the behaviour of a GPU related blob? Or a kernel driver?
Actually the GPL is legally based on the copyright laws. Without the copyright laws, the GPL is not enforcable. So it cannot be in opposition.Yes, it's called copyright, which is in opposition to the copyleft of the GPL and so on.
Who owns these binary-blobs? Maybe it would be possible for the license to change them to a GPL-compatible license.
I had two events with my quite limited adventure with hardware:
1. We accidentally flashed firmware for 300dpi printer to 200dpi one. Printer started to work in 300dpi. Even barcodes are more clear. We popped a SRAM in, and we got a 300dpi model. There was a 50% price difference between 200 and 300dpi models.
2. One of the cheapest Samsung flat TVs. What does this "somethingPVRsomething" option in service mode do? Let's check. Turns video recording on USB drive on, while these TVs with "USB recording" support are more expensive.
Do you expect manufacturers would release the code and get losses?
