Eddie
Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
- Messages
- 168
- Age
- 33
and here is some more info into why http://www.rense.com/general81/emfs.htm
No offense, I'm also quite sceptical about the influcence of the evergrowing amount of wireless signals, and I tend to keep my sourrounding as wireless free as possible, but that "article" is complete and utter bollocks.and here is some more info into why http://www.rense.com/general81/emfs.htm
Well 10 years ago people were saying we would all die from using the mobile phones too much, yet I have not heard of any significant increase in brain cancer, and even if there is, it's in no relation with the exponential use of mobile devices.I don't understand this current trend saying that if corporations say something and there's some tin foil hat addict contesting they are automatically right and there's a big evil scheme behind...
Can you stop the pseudo science bullshit ?radiation from the sun can save your life and helps produce vitamin D your supposed to get 1-2 hrs a day. And vitamin D is not a vitamin, no vitamins in the human body does the body make on it's own. The Vitamin D thats being added to food is thought to be a immo supressent. To much synthic betacaroten will kill you (an overdose) but to much natural betacaroten will turn you orange then your body will process it out.
Your link is very appropriate indeed.
4-5 There is no good way to answer fools when they say something stupid. If you answer them, then you, too, will look like a fool. If you don’t answer them, they will think they are smart.
People make illicit money of all kinds of natural things. Frankly your analysis is pretty offensive to me.So I saw a video of a man who was getting paid to dress like a girl and flirt with guys at a bar, he said he wasnt gay but it was good money. If you just looked at the first turn you would think oh here is a happy gay man, then go on. But if you knew his situation or perhaps the real information about how most gays end up going straight after a few years and people were getting rich off the movement then you would think something eles.
And neither does those that claim to be sensitive to it if they cannot see it. It has been shown in experiment after experiment that when you blind the subject by hiding the access point or the opposite (placing a non-radioing dummy in plain sight), then they feel the radiation when there is not, and vice versa. That is, it is a fear reaction from what you see, not a physical reaction to the radiation.But I don't feel any different whether my router is turned on or not, and I don't know of anyone near me who is distressed by it, so the convenience of it wins out for me.
I'm kind of dumbstruck here. ""Most gays end up going straight after a few years" - Uhm, no? "People get cancer because of too little sex due to cheating spouses" - Ehm, what? There is a lot of the offensive in here.Frankly your analysis is pretty offensive to me.
Point of order: I'm pretty sure vice-versa is true. If X causes Y then they are related by the fact that X causes Y.Correlation is not causation. and vice-versa
That only holds true for simple systems and large samples. For example, there is a general causative link between rainstorms and my back room flooding. Yet it would be possible for another factor (getting my drains cleaned out) to break the rainstorm-flood correlation in a small number of cases.Point of order: I'm pretty sure vice-versa is true. If X causes Y then they are related by the fact that X causes Y.Correlation is not causation. and vice-versa![]()
That's just semantics though, the actual statements and intentions are good.
This whole thing reminds me of the wind farm debate currently happening here in Ontario. So much bad science it makes me want to cry.
Rainstorms and flooding is the correlation. Rainstorms with clogged drains is the causation of flooding. Remove the clogged drain and break both the correlation and the causation.For example, there is a general causative link between rainstorms and my back room flooding. Yet it would be possible for another factor (getting my drains cleaned out) to break the rainstorm-flood correlation in a small number of cases.
Yep.Rainstorms and flooding is the correlation. Rainstorms with clogged drains is the causation of flooding. Remove the clogged drain and break both the correlation and the causation.For example, there is a general causative link between rainstorms and my back room flooding. Yet it would be possible for another factor (getting my drains cleaned out) to break the rainstorm-flood correlation in a small number of cases.