But it's a natural evolution. We want it.
First, "intellectual property" policies was applied to the Internet. We all know that it is used for censorship and most artists get nothing from legal actions. And it was used. More, people were so manipulated that they accepted it.
Next, we had "children". More censorship of course to "protect the children". And we accepted it only because it was sound with our myths and unsound with other people's myths. Analyzing from outside, there is nothing more - the true answer would be to make people stop living on debt and look for own children like they should, yet it's not politically correct.
In Poland we have "gambling act" which prevents foreign companies from organizing gambling in country. In many countries there are similar regulations but related to sports, traditions or knowledge distribution. So people accepted it and called it "freedom".
So what do we expected? That it will stop? This is ridiculous. We had example of amateur TV!
Now we will get more censorship acts because of "fake news" problem while the solution: "analyze the source!" cannot be spread - because people may start to think that everything is a nice Matrix-like environment where most definitions have been re-defined [*]. And the true problem is that there is less and less knowledge, but more and more "content" which is made only to be used for advertisements. So what will we got? More censorship of course! Censorship of everything except this "content".
The problem is that even if we re-create the Internet from scratch, using block-chain technologies in widely-distributed decentralized network, this will come back, just on another abstraction level. Because we are the main enemies of Internet freedom. It could be seen when Google introduced ranks based on links - most "interesting links" subpages on personal websites disappeared because authors were envious that other author's site would pop higher. And without this framework the ecosystem had fallen apart giving place to purely marketing lies.
* I exploit it to "be a scientist" for 5 years and I know another Professor who exploited it and now he is a maths Ph.D without knowing what integrals are

.