DNF (Did Not Finish)
- Apr 25, 2011
Sounds interesting, think I missed that first time around.FWIW, I'm okay with bringing ROT back; I jhad hoped it coudl continue without my pressuring folks, but I think it was not popular enough to have its own steam, and needed folks driving it with a whipe to keep it going (and I was about to have babies in the family, so got completely derailed.. still am )
I understand that Beef wanted a "disc-mag". My goal when I started the web version was to create a bastardised browser that "disc-mag"'d the website. Yeah, every exposure you can get has to be the best route IMOI for one, won't use a PND-executable-only form; its rediculous.
The Wiki lists people who previously contributed - That's also visible from the two issues on my website. I haven't retained lists from people that said they would then didn't or from the "3rd issue" - I told them to just send stuff to Beef when he started releasing the PND version. That's basically where I left (my) Inside The Box.Ask pmprog for the list of people who contributed or promised-to there, and then ask them if they'd do something ..
Maybe, or maybe not. However, a couple of the potential contributors to my ITB issue 3 didn't like that you had no formatting options - and that you would override their formatting anyway.Hey Jeff, we all know that ITB was created to view ITB on original pandoras firstly and for openpandora's users, so its not surpise that it comes in pnd format. Other than you know and I know that open markup / open ideas are not the problem from your side.
Anyway, I would be willing to contribute to something - whether it be a blog or a zine or something - but not regularly; at least this year.