Hey Benji,
Is it me or did you not preorder? It just seems to me that you have no concept as to how a supply system actually works. Its called money. That is all I have for you. It perplexes me as to how you have such a hard on for CC and some type of explanation or apology. The fact of the matter is that they are doing what they've been and are being paid to do. Doing nothing with someones resources and telling them that you are doing something with their resources by allowing them to take up space in your warehouse is progress. I think you ask too many questions, but more importantly you ask the wrong ones repeatedly. I think ED is better off working on other things than holding your hand through this.
It's just you. I definitely have a preorder (and no, I'm not telling you my number).
I understand how supply-and-demand works, and agree that money is everything. I understand that companies think they can jerk OPT around, because they don't have a lot of money, and can't defend themselves. But that's the purpose of contracts - both parties agree on something, sign, shake hands, whatever, and then both sides have to abide by it, or suffer the penalties (hopefully) laid out in said contract.
The thing is, we had a contract, and they didn't follow through. They told us they were, and then scrambled when we called their bluff. All we have is theories about why they did this, and so I still want to know what *their* explanation was. ED did say he would
keep us updated.
I'm sorry if you don't like my questions - but I try to ask the hard ones that no one else is asking. Maybe I just didn't read the enough of the ranty CC thread. I'm not a yes-man, so I question decisions like "well, they were bad before, but seem to be OK now, so I guess we can try trusting them again." If it was easy, or a simple answer, then it would have been thought of and done already. ED told us that the TV cables would be ordered after the next 500 boards from CC shipped. He changed his mind; that's fine, now we know. But hiding things under the rug can lead to issues later on, which is why I push it.
I don't need my hand held, and I don't need an answer to everything. But there are still a number of things that are pending, and I don't want to see still more delays because of oversights. I'd really prefer not to see this project fail.
Me thinks you have very limited experience of PCB/product manufacture. Splitting the production would be the best way to ensure both options fail. Keep the options open, make today's decisions based on best information available now, not what seemed like a good idea last year.
Not on a large-scale level, no. But based on my current information - which is a lack of explanation from CC - I still don't trust them as far as I could throw a broken nub. But the problem is that you can't just switch immediately. It takes time to set up a contract/production at another place - ED told us several times that it was on the order of months. So that means you either (1) never switch or (2) prepare for a transition when thinks are looking brownish. So you prepare, and after all that, it seems worth peeking to see how far the light at the end of the tunnel is. Because once you start at two places, one will have to stop. It could easily be the new one, if it's not any better. But it can *never* be CC, if you're not willing to try.
Of course it is! Like you, I don't like it, but it's common practice and they do that all the time. You seem to believe your business partner is your friend. Well, sorry to break your bubble, it's not. It just cares for profit, and will do whatever it thinks is appropriate to optimise its business at any given time. Obviously at that time, CC didn't really trust OP to actually make it, and who could blame them? There are many stories of failures on that kind of business.
Now that OP proved to them they could be valuable as partners, a relation of trust and mutual profit has been created, and they will do whatever they can to keep OP as a customer. That is called capitalism, you might like it or not, but it's the economic world we're living in.
Yes, my business partner is trying to make a buck. But some of them are still my friends. And Capitalism definitely not about saying one thing and do another. It's about doing (and agreeing to do) the thing that will be most profitable long-term (well, maybe medium-term). It might be most profitable now to promise to do lots of jobs that you'll never do - but that's corporate suicide, because the word will get out, and then you'll stop getting business. And that's close to what CC did. If they'd been upfront and told OPT they were going to waited for the nubs, no one would have held them at fault, and everything would have been fine and dandy (well, minus the nub issues, of course). But that's not what they did. For three (four?) months, they told us they were working hard on the boards, and kept being "almost done", then guess what? I've not had any experiences like that and if anyone I deal with tried to pull that on me, I'd never work with them again, because they completely undermined any future trust I could have. Of course, maybe they had a really (*really*) good reason. Which is what I'm asking. But no one from OPT will give an official response.